Current:Home > MyFormat of public comment meetings for Dakota Access oil pipeline upsets opponents -WealthMap Solutions
Format of public comment meetings for Dakota Access oil pipeline upsets opponents
View
Date:2025-04-27 20:53:01
BISMARCK, N.D. (AP) — Opponents of the Dakota Access oil pipeline are taking issue with the format of private oral testimony in meetings for public comment on a draft environmental review of the controversial pipeline.
The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers is in the midst of two public comment meetings in Bismarck, North Dakota, the first held Wednesday, the second set for Thursday. People wishing to give testimony may do so orally in a curtained area with a stenographer, or do so in writing at tables.
The Standing Rock Sioux Tribe has long opposed the pipeline due to the risk of an oil spill contaminating the tribe’s drinking water supply. The four-state pipeline crosses under the Missouri River just upstream of the tribe’s reservation.
The long-awaited draft environmental review, released in September, outlines five options for the pipeline’s fate. Those include denying the easement for the controversial crossing and removing or abandoning a 7,500-foot (2,286-meter) segment, or granting the easement with no changes or with additional safety measures. A fifth option is to reroute the pipeline north of Bismarck, which would require new state, local and federal permits.
Many opponents of the pipeline had hoped Wednesday’s meeting would have allowed them to publicly question the Corps and pipeline developer Energy Transfer, The Bismarck Tribune reported.
Joe Lafferty, a Native American activist who opposes the pipeline, poured oil and water into a cup and challenged Corps officials to take a drink.
“If it means so much to you, I want you, DAPL, Army Corps of Engineers, drink this water with oil in it and then maybe, as a Lakota I’ll consider your request,” Lafferty said. His demonstration did not count as official testimony.
Republican state Agriculture Commissioner Doug Goehring, who sits on a state panel that regulates oil and gas, said the meeting was a fair process.
“I heard a comment saying, ‘This is no democratic way’ -- why, I think it very much is because you get a chance to say your piece,” he said.
About 150 to 200 people attended Wednesday’s meeting, Corps spokesperson Steve Wolf told The Associated Press. About 80 people gave oral testimony, taken down by two stenographers, which Wolf said enabled the Corps to receive more comments. The Corps received about 50 written comments.
“I understand the fact that some people want to be performative and try to create some kind of a fanfare in front of an audience of people, but that’s not the spirit and intent of the law or the meeting,” Wolf told the AP. The Corps is “absolutely on the right side of the law in how we’re doing this,” he said.
Standing Rock Sioux Tribal Chairwoman Janet Alkire last month called for the draft review to be invalidated, with a new one begun and the pipeline shut down.
A virtual meeting with only tribes is set for Nov. 8. The public comment meetings should be held on the reservation, said Peter Capossela, one of Standing Rock’s attorneys. The Bismarck meetings are more convenient for corporate executives and state officials than for tribal members who live as far as 120 miles (190 kilometers) away, he said.
“If the Army Corps is genuinely interested in hearing the views of tribal members and learning about the potential environmental impacts of an oil spill at the DAPL/Lake Oahe crossing, it would have held public hearings on the reservation that’s going to be polluted by a spill,” Capossela told the AP.
Wolf said the Corps is “being as open and transparent as we can possibly be through all of this, and nobody is being excluded from anything by us.”
State government and oil industry leaders view the pipeline as crucial infrastructure and the safest method for transporting oil, rather than by rail. Officials such as North Dakota Gov. Doug Burgum and U.S. Sen. John Hoeven have said they prefer the pipeline to continue operating as it has.
The public comment period ends Dec. 13. A final decision whether to grant or deny the easement is expected in late 2024.
veryGood! (2)
Related
- Paris Hilton, Nicole Richie return for an 'Encore,' reminisce about 'The Simple Life'
- This Week in Clean Economy: NYC Takes the Red Tape Out of Building Green
- Biden Names Ocasio-Cortez, Kerry to Lead His Climate Task Force, Bridging Democrats’ Divide
- What Does ’12 Years to Act on Climate Change’ (Now 11 Years) Really Mean?
- Grammy nominee Teddy Swims on love, growth and embracing change
- Days of 100-Degree Heat Will Become Weeks as Climate Warms, U.S. Study Warns
- Man arrested after allegedly throwing phone at Bebe Rexha during concert
- EPA’s Methane Estimates for Oil and Gas Sector Under Investigation
- Nearly half of US teens are online ‘constantly,’ Pew report finds
- The TikTok-Famous Zombie Face Mask Exceeds the Hype, Delivering 8 Skincare Treatments in 1 Product
Ranking
- Can Bill Belichick turn North Carolina into a winner? At 72, he's chasing one last high
- A Marine Heat Wave Intensifies, with Risks for Wildlife, Hurricanes and California Wildfires
- Ranking Oil Companies by Climate Risk: Exxon Is Near the Top
- Allergic to cats? There may be hope!
- Hackers hit Rhode Island benefits system in major cyberattack. Personal data could be released soon
- Medication abortion is still possible with just one drug. Here's how it works
- Basketball powers Kansas and North Carolina will face each other in home-and-home series
- Deforestation Is Getting Worse, 5 Years After Countries and Companies Vowed to Stop It
Recommendation
South Korea's acting president moves to reassure allies, calm markets after Yoon impeachment
A Good Friday funeral in Texas. Baby Halo's parents had few choices in post-Roe Texas
Oceans Are Melting Glaciers from Below Much Faster than Predicted, Study Finds
Daniel Day-Lewis Looks Unrecognizable in First Public Sighting in 4 Years
Working Well: When holidays present rude customers, taking breaks and the high road preserve peace
Trump (Sort of) Accepted Covid-19 Modeling. Don’t Expect the Same on Climate Change.
You're less likely to get long COVID after a second infection than a first
This Week in Clean Economy: Northeast States Bucking Carbon Emissions Trend